|
|
SUMMARY
Persons with hemophilia in the United States, Latin
America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa were
infected with contaminated blood products. Lieff Cabraser
is representing clients from around the world in lawsuits
filed in U.S. courts against American blood companies
that sold in the U.S. and exported contaminated blood
worldwide. |
|
| We are investigating the blood factor products and conduct of
the American blood companies around the world. We are currently representing
clients from the following nations: |
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
Austria |
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Chile |
|
|
Colombia |
|
|
Costa
Rica |
 |
Denmark |
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Honduras |
|
|
Hong
Kong |
|
|
Israel |
|
|
Italy |
|
|
New
Zealand |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Norway |
|
|
Panama |
|
|
Peru |
|
|
South
Africa |
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
Taiwan |
|
|
United
Kingdom |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
 |
Media Center
|
| Members of the media who
wish to speak to a Lieff Cabraser attorney should
call Stephen H. Cassidy, Esq., Director of Marketing,
at (415) 956-1000, or contact Mr. Cassidy via e-mail
to scassidy@lchb.com. |
| Click
here for Press Articles relating to the Blood
Factor case. |
|
|
|
| |
Press Articles |
| October
13, 2004 |
The Recorder, "Blood
Feud" |
Two
decades after hemophiliacs first accused four drug makers
of intentionally selling them HIV-contaminated blood products,
lawyers from Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein are seeking class status for at least 2,000
U.S. and foreign plaintiffs who say they suffered similar
damages.
The
complaint alleges that Baxter Healthcare Corp., Bayer, Armour
Pharmaceutical Co. and Alpha Therapeutic Corp. sold contaminated
blood serum overseas for nearly two years after it withdrew
the product -- under FDA pressure -- from the U.S. market.
Additionally, Lieff Cabraser lawyers say the companies knowingly
infected Americans with hepatitis C.
"It's
a story about companies knowing they had a blood product
that was tainted.
The result was that 80 percent of
the people who took this product died," said partner
Robert Lieff, the lead attorney in the case.
The
drugs in question, known as Factor VIII and Factor IX, were
considered miraculous when first released in 1980. They could
stop profuse bleeding almost immediately, and quickly became
a widely used therapy. But the products were made from donated
blood serum, and until 1983, donors were not screened for
HIV.
The
initial wave of lawsuits had mixed results for plaintiffs
who had trouble proving that the companies were negligent.
Some lost at trial, while most -- a total of 6,000 -- agreed
to a 1997 settlement that awarded each family $100,000.
In
2000, Lieff Cabraser partner Donald
Arbitblit represented nine victims who opted out of a
1997 group settlement. They reached a confidential settlement
with the companies. That led to a windfall for Lieff Cabraser.
"Through that work, we became connected to what was
a pretty connected network of worldwide hemophilia organizations," said
Arbitblit.
Seven partners
are working on the case, with Robert Nelson, Heather Foster,
Morris Ratner, Fabrice Vincent and Elizabeth Cabraser joining
Lieff.
According
to Lieff's class certification motion, international sales
documents obtained in discovery from the previous suits show
the drug companies marketing contaminated serum overseas
when clean stocks were available. The documents also claim
that the companies sold hepatitis C-tainted product in the
U.S. for at least two years after contamination was found. |
| |
| May 8, 2004 |
The
Christchurch Press (New Zealand), "Global
Bad Blood Scandal" |
Three New Zealanders so far have joined thousands of haemophiliacs
worldwide in a class action against four US pharmaceutical
giants (and subsidiaries), claiming they were exposed
to HIV and hepatitis C. The law suit, filed by Lieff
Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein in the San Francisco Federal court, claims
that products from the US companies resulted in mass infection
and deaths of thousands of haemophiliacs.
The accused companies are Bayer Corporation and its Cutter
Biological division, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and its
Hyland division, Armour Pharmaceutical Company and Alpha
Therapeutic Corporation. The lawsuit claims that three companies
recruited donors from high-risk populations, including prisoners
and intravenous drug users, to obtain plasma for the production
of clotting agents.
The law suit claims that the US products, sold worldwide
in the late 1970s and 1980s as beneficial "medicines",
were, in fact, contaminated with the HIV virus and/or hepatitis
C. It alleges that the companies stopped selling the products
in the US because of the known risk of HIV and hepatitis
C transmission. But it claims the companies continued distributing
the old, non- heat-treated medicine in Europe, Latin America
and Asia, after introducing a safer product in the US.
The status of US blood products exported to New Zealand at
the time is also under investigation by Lieff Cabraser. Lieff
Cabraser primary attorney Lexi Hazam confirmed three New
Zealanders are among the 1500 plaintiffs from more than 10
countries, including Italy, Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Hong
Kong, Israel and the United Kingdom.
"This is a worldwide tragedy affecting thousands of
people," she said. Her firm is waiting to receive company
records under discovery, which will enable plaintiffs' medical
records to be matched against contaminated batches of blood. |
| |
| September 7, 2003 |
The
Sunday Times (London), "Blood Risk for Haemophiliacs
'Covered Up'" |
The
danger of using infected blood products on haemophiliacs
was known to government officials more than 20 years ago,
newly uncovered documents reveal. Papers seen by the Sunday
Times show doctors had linked cases of hepatitis C to specific
brands of blood-clotting agents during a monitoring project
in the 1970s.
Thousands
of haemophiliacs in Britain contracted hepatitis C from contaminated
blood-clotting products used in their treatment in the 1970s
and 1980s. The condition attacks the liver and can cause
cirrhosis, liver failure and cancer.
Carol
Grayson, co-ordinator of Haemophilia Action UK, who uncovered
the documents, said: "We were told nothing. They knew
there was another type of hepatitis that was attacking the
liver whether there was a test or not." Haemophiliac
Andy Gunn, who is pursuing legal action in America against
plasma manufacturers over alleged contamination, said he
would ensure his lawyers were aware of the documents. |
| |
| June 30, 2003 |
The
Daily Journal, "Hemophiliacs Sue U.S. Blood
Companies" |
Four
U.S. companies exposed thousands of hemophiliacs to HIV
and hepatitis C in the 1980s by selling them blood-clotting
medicine made from high-risk donors, even after the transmission
risk was known, a lawsuit alleges.
The
class action, filed in San Francisco federal court June 2,
claims the drug firms focused on the bottom line, collecting
blood from urban homosexuals, prisoners and intravenous drug
users. The suit also accuses the companies of selling their
surplus stock to hemophiliacs in Europe, Latin America and
Asia in 1984 and 1985 after introducing a safer product in
the United States.
"It's
a worldwide tragedy," says the class's lead attorney, Robert
J. Nelson of Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP in San Francisco. "Thousands of people
were made very, very sick, many of whom have died, as a direct
result of the conduct of these American companies." |
| |
| June 5, 2003 |
The
Japan Times, "Japanese hemophiliacs invited
to join U.S. suit over tainted-blood sales" |
A
class action lawsuit was filed in a San Francisco federal
court Monday on behalf of 15 European hemophiliacs suing
seven firms, including a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Pharm
Corp., for selling contaminated blood products that exposed
them to HIV and hepatitis C, their lawyer said Tuesday.
Attorney Robert
Nelson said thousands of Japanese could also be named
as potential plaintiffs because they contracted hepatitis
C from unheated blood-clotting agents for hemophiliacs sold
by Mitsubishi Pharm subsidiary Alpha Therapeutic Corp. as
well as Bayer Corp., Baxter Healthcare Corp. and its subsidiary.
"This
is a worldwide tragedy," Nelson said. "Thousands
of hemophiliacs have unnecessarily died from AIDS and many
thousands more are infected with HIV or hepatitis C." |
| |
| June 4, 2003 |
The
Guardian (UK), "Law Suit for Infected Blood" |
An
American firm has launched a lawsuit on behalf of haemophiliacs
and survivors of haemophiliacs who were supposedly infected
by contaminated blood products. The plaintiffs were allegedly
infected with HIV or Hepatitis C after being given the
product in the early to mid-80s.
"Tens
of thousands of haemophiliacs globally were infected with
HIV or HCV after receiving blood products from blood plasma
that was originally manufactured in the US," said attorney
Robert Nelson of the San Francisco-based firm Lieff Cabraser,
which is bringing the action on behalf of clients.
At
present, 15 people from the United Kingdom, Italy and Germany
are named in the action. |
| |
| June 3, 2003 |
The
San Francisco Chronicle, "Bad blood between
hemophiliacs, Bayer Patients sue over tainted transfusions
spreading HIV, hep C" |
A
San Francisco attorney filed a class-action lawsuit Monday
on behalf of thousands of hemophiliacs who claim that Bayer
Corp. and several other companies knowingly sold blood
products contaminated with HIV and hepatitis C.
The
lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleges
that the companies conspired to sell blood-clotting products
that were manufactured using blood from sick, high-risk donors.
The
suit also alleges that companies stopped selling the products
in the United States because of the known risk of HIV and
hepatitis transmission but continued distributing the infected
products in Latin America, Asia and Europe in 1984 and 1985. |
| |
| June 3, 2003 |
The
Los Angeles Times, "Lawsuit Alleges Companies
Sold Bad Blood" |
Thousands
of hemophiliacs filed a class-action lawsuit against Bayer
Corp. and other companies, claiming they exposed patients
to HIV and hepatitis C by selling products made with blood
from sick, high-risk donors.
The
lawsuits, filed in federal court, allege the companies continued
distributing the blood-clotting products in Asia and Latin
America in 1984 and 1985, even after they stopped selling
them in the United States because of the known risk of HIV
and hepatitis transmission.
In
Germany, Bayer declined to comment on the suit, saying it
had not yet received the relevant documents. Baxter Healthcare
Corp., also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately return
calls seeking comment. |
| |
| June 2, 2003 |
The
Boston Globe, Editorial, "Bayer's Bad Medicine" |
In
the first years of the AIDS epidemic, many victims of the
disease were hemophiliacs who used a clotting medicine
made by mixing blood plasma from many donors. After the
makers discovered that their product was transmitting a
lethal infection, they started heating it to destroy the
virus. But at least one company, a division of Bayer named
Cutter Biological, continued to sell its nonheated medicine
in Asia and Latin America after switching to the heated
version for customers in North America and Europe. The
callousness of the firm's decision making on what to do
with "excess nonheated inventory" comes through
in company memoranda reported on in the New York Times.
After the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wraned
in March 1983 that blood products were apparently transmitting
AIDS to hemophiliacs, Cutter in February 1984 got US approval
for a heated version of its medicine. But it continued
making the nonheated medicine until August of that year
and continued to ship it until July 1985.
Bayer
told the Times that Cutter continued to make the unsafe product
after starting to produce the safer version because some
customers preferred the original medicine, fearing (wrongly)
that the heating process would hurt its quality. Also, it
said, some countries delayed approving the new version, and
there was a shortage of plasma.
But
the Times said Cutter's records indicate it was trying to
profit on "several large fixed-price contracts." At
one point, when Asian hemophiliacs started asking for the
safer medicine, Cutter told its Hong Kong distributor that
almost all heated supplies were going to the United States
and Europe, but a small amount would be available for Hong
Kong's "most vocal patients." |
| |
May 23, 2003
South China Morning Post, "US
Firm Sold Off Tainted Medicine in HK - HIV-Contaminated
Blood Was Used Here While A Safer Version Was Sold
Overseas" |
Hong
Kong hemophiliacs were forced to rely in the mid-1980s
on HIV-contaminated blood-clotting medicine sold across
the region by a US company -- even while it marketed its
newer, safer version of the drug in America and Europe.
A
South China Morning Post investigation has found the firm,
Cutter, continued selling its Koate brand of blood coagulant
concentrate in Hong Kong for 18 months after it started distributing
a heat-treated version free of HIV in the US. At various
times, the older and cheaper product was also sold in Taiwan,
Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Japan.
The
Post's investigation, conducted together with the New York
Times, discovered how Cutter -- owned by German pharmaceutical
giant Bayer -- told its Hong Kong distributor that the non
heat-treated concentrate had "no severe hazard" even
months after the US medical authorities confirmed that heat
treatment could kill the HIV virus in blood products. One
telex from Cutter to its Hong Kong distributor insisted that
they "use up stocks" of the older drug while other
documents show it had continued exporting the products for
two months after the US Food and Drug Administration had
said that it was "absolutely unacceptible." The
government later confirmed that 61 of Hong Kong's more than
200 hemophiliacs had been infected with HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS. |
| |
| May 22, 2003 |
The
New York Times, "Two Paths of Bayer Drug in
80's: Riskier Type Went Overseas" |
A
division of the pharmaceutical company Bayer sold millions
of dollars of blood-clotting medicine for hemophiliacs
-- medicine that carried a high risk of transmitting AIDS
-- to Asia and Latin America in the mid-1980s while selling
a new, safer product in the West, according to documents
obtained by the New York Times.
The
Bayer unit, Cutter Biological, introduced its safer medicine
in late February 1984 as evidence mounted that the earlier
version was infecting hemophiliacs with HIV. Yet for over
a year, the company continued to sell the old medicine overseas,
prompting a United States regulator to accuse Cutter of breaking
its promise to stop selling the product.
By
continuing to sell the old version of the life-saving medicine,
the records show, Cutter officials were trying to avoid being
stuck with large stores of a product that was proving increasingly
unmarketable in the United States and Europe. Yet even after
it began selling the new product, the company kept making
the old medicine for several months more. A telex from Cutter
to a distributor suggests one reason behind that decision,
too: the company had several fixed-price contracts and believed
that the old product would be cheaper to produce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2007 Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
|
|